Bricks Builder
Gutenberg Classic Theme Premium
Author: Bricks | Last Updated: 10.02.2026

Bricks Builder v2.2

Quick Verdict

Bricks Builder is a high-performance, developer-focused theme that offers exceptional speed and granular control over website design and code output. However, its steep learning curve and complex interface make it unsuitable for beginners or direct client handoff, and it has a history of critical security vulnerabilities, though the development team is known for deploying patches very rapidly.

Analysis

Bricks Builder is a modern, performance-oriented site builder designed exclusively for professional web developers and agencies. Its primary strength lies in its exceptionally clean code output and minimal bloat, which allows for the creation of incredibly fast websites that can easily achieve top scores on Core Web Vitals. The builder provides granular control over every aspect of the design, from semantic HTML tags to advanced CSS properties, and features a best-in-class native integration with Advanced Custom Fields (ACF).

The power and flexibility of Bricks come with a significant trade-off: a steep learning curve. Unlike beginner-friendly builders, Bricks requires a solid understanding of web development fundamentals like CSS Flexbox and Grid. This makes it a poor choice for DIY users and presents a major challenge when handing over a completed site to a non-technical client, as the complex interface can be easily broken without extensive safeguards and user role restrictions.

While highly praised by its professional user base, prospective buyers should be aware of its history. The theme has faced several critical security vulnerabilities, though the development team’s response has been commendably fast, often issuing patches within days. Furthermore, major version updates have been known to introduce breaking changes, reinforcing the need for a professional workflow that includes thorough testing on a staging environment before deploying to a live site.

Gutenberg
Agency
Classic Theme
✅ Pros
• Exceptional performance and low bloat
• Granular control for developers
• Gold-standard ACF integration
❌ Cons
• Steep learning curve for non-developers
• History of critical security vulnerabilities
• Major updates can introduce breaking changes
Plugin Compatibility
Will my plugins work?
Research Confidence: High
Safe if
Bricks Builder is a safe choice for projects that rely heavily on Advanced Custom Fields (ACF), as its native integration is considered best-in-class for most use cases, including repeaters and flexible content fields [5].
Check before purchase
Be cautious when using Bricks with WPML's Advanced Translation Editor, as it can erroneously translate dynamic data tags, breaking their functionality until a workaround is applied [7].
Avoid if
Avoid Bricks if your project depends on deep, out-of-the-box integration with complex, niche WooCommerce add-ons for features like advanced bookings or memberships, as this often requires custom PHP development to bridge the gap [16].

Community Quotes

"Between 2023 and early 2025, Bricks Builder encountered several high-severity vulnerabilities, including an unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (CVE-2024-25600), a privilege escalation (CVE-2024-2297), and an unauthenticated blind SQL injection (CVE-2025-6495)."

— patchstack.com [1], github.com [3], patchstack.com [4]

"Real-world development experiences highlight specific challenges when nesting repeaters inside custom WP_Query loops... the builder sometimes defaults to searching for the repeater on the current page rather than the post being queried."

— forum.bricksbuilder.io [5], forum.bricksbuilder.io [6]

"A significant issue identified in late 2024 involved WPML's "Advanced Translation Editor" (ATE) erroneously translating dynamic data tags. For example, a tag like {acf_button_url} would be translated into the target language, effectively breaking the link."

— wpml.org [7]

Client Handoff
Can the client manage it?
Research Confidence: High
Safe if
This builder is safe for development teams and agencies where the end-client will not be given full administrative access to the builder's design controls.
Check before purchase
Exercise caution when handing a Bricks-built site to a non-technical client, as the complexity of the interface can easily lead to broken layouts and design inconsistencies without proper training or role restrictions [11].
Avoid if
Avoid Bricks Builder if you are a DIY user or a beginner looking for a simple drag-and-drop experience, as it requires a solid understanding of CSS concepts like Flexbox and Grid for effective use [14].
Panel Difficulty
Complex
Documentation
Good
Learning Curve
Days

Community Quotes

"Handoff to non-technical clients is often cited as the builder's weakest point. Giving a client full access to the Bricks editor frequently leads to broken layouts and design inconsistency."

— forum.bricksbuilder.io [11]

Freelancer Recommendation
Bricks Builder is recommended for professional developers and agencies who will maintain the site post-launch. For client editing, it's crucial to use the built-in role manager or third-party tools to create a simplified and locked-down editing experience to prevent accidental changes [12].
Alternatives: Elementor, Divi Builder
Performance & SEO
Will the site be fast?
Research Confidence: High
Safe if
Bricks Builder is a safe choice for projects where achieving top-tier Core Web Vitals and fast loading times is a primary business requirement, as its clean code output and minimal bloat are engineered for speed [15].
Check before purchase
While the builder itself is highly optimized, be cautious that using many third-party plugins or unoptimized, high-resolution images can still negatively impact performance scores despite the theme's excellent foundation.
Avoid if
There is no performance-related reason to avoid Bricks Builder, as it is widely regarded as one of the fastest and most lightweight visual site builders available for WordPress.
95
Mobile
Benchmark: 90+
99
Desktop
Benchmark: 90+
1.92s
LCP Mobile
Benchmark: <2.5s
1.83s
LCP Desktop
Benchmark: <2.5s
Test Information
Test Date: 2026-02-15

Code Observation (demo):

The official website scored an excellent 95/100 on Google PageSpeed Insights for mobile, with a Good LCP of 1.92s and a perfect CLS of 0. This performance is consistent with community reports praising its lightweight nature, loading only a fraction of the scripts compared to competitors [15, 16].

⚠️ Based on DevTools inspection of demo, not a production audit

Freelancer Recommendation

Bricks is an excellent choice for performance-critical websites. Its native optimization features and clean DOM output provide a solid foundation for achieving near-perfect PageSpeed scores, making it ideal for SEO-focused projects and agencies that prioritize speed.

Alternatives: GeneratePress, Kadence Theme
Update Safety
Will updates break the site?
Research Confidence: High
Safe if
Bricks is safe for developers who follow best practices by testing major updates on a staging environment before deploying to a live production site.
Check before purchase
Use caution when applying major version updates, as they have historically introduced breaking changes, such as the implementation of CSS Cascade Layers in version 2.0, which required manual adjustments to custom CSS implementations [8].
Avoid if
Avoid automatically updating Bricks on critical client websites without a thorough testing process, as some updates have caused issues like style guide corruption or required manual reconfiguration of complex global elements [9, 10].

Community Quotes

"Version 2.0 introduced CSS Cascade Layers (@layer) by default... it initially broke many custom CSS implementations that relied on traditional specificity overrides."

— bricksbuilder.io [8]

"Real-user reports on Reddit and the official forums suggested that while the 2.2-RC... phase was relatively stable, some users experienced style guide corruption, where existing color palettes were not properly mapped to the new HSL-based variable system."

— bricksbuilder.io [9], reddit.com [10]

Freelancer Recommendation

Always use a staging site to test major Bricks Builder updates. The development team moves quickly and introduces modern features, which can sometimes alter existing behavior. Subscribing to their changelog and community forums is essential to stay informed about potential breaking changes before updating live sites.

Alternatives: Oxygen Builder, Breakdance
Scalability
Can I use it for multiple projects?
Research Confidence: Medium

Community Quotes

"Unlike drag-and-drop builders intended for DIY users, Bricks requires an understanding of CSS Flexbox, Grid, and the DOM structure."

— digisavvy.com [14]

Costs
Pricing breakdown
Explicit Costs
  • Regular License $79
  • Support (12) Included
  • Starter $79
  • Business $149
  • Agency $249
  • Ultimate Lifetime $599
Hidden Costs (Community)
No hidden costs reported.
Demo Gallery
0 example sites

No demos available.

Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions from community

Generated from common user questions and documented issues found in forums and reviews.

Is Bricks Builder secure?

Plugin Compatibility

Bricks has a documented history of critical vulnerabilities, including Remote Code Execution and SQL injection flaws [1, 3, 4]. However, the development team is highly regarded for its rapid and transparent response, often issuing security patches within 24-72 hours of a confirmed report [2].

Sources: 1,2,3,4

Is Bricks Builder suitable for beginners or clients who want to edit their own site?

Client Handoff

No, Bricks is designed for web development professionals and has a steep learning curve that requires an understanding of CSS principles [14]. Handoff to non-technical clients is a significant challenge, and it is recommended to severely restrict their editing permissions to prevent them from breaking the site's design [11].

Sources: 11,14

How does Bricks Builder's performance compare to other builders like Elementor?

Performance & Speed

Bricks is significantly faster and more lightweight than many other popular builders. It produces very clean code and loads minimal assets, with a basic page loading around 15KB of scripts compared to over 200KB for a similar page in Elementor, resulting in superior Core Web Vitals [15].

Sources: 15

Will major updates to Bricks break my site?

Updates & Stability

It is possible. Major updates, such as version 2.0, have introduced fundamental changes like CSS Cascade Layers that can break existing custom CSS [8]. Some users have also reported issues like style guide corruption after certain updates, making it critical to test on a staging site first [9, 10].

Sources: 8,9,10

Does Bricks Builder work well with Advanced Custom Fields (ACF)?

Plugin Compatibility

Yes, its native integration with ACF is a major strength and is considered a "gold standard" [5]. However, developers have reported edge cases where complex setups, like nested ACF repeaters inside a custom query loop, do not work as expected without specific workarounds [6].

Sources: 5,6

What is the official support like?

Support Quality

Official support is handled via email and a private forum. While generally responsive, users have reported that response times can slow down significantly to over a week during the release cycle of a major new version [13, 17].

Sources: 13,17

Does Bricks have deep integration with all WooCommerce extensions?

Plugin Compatibility

While core WooCommerce compatibility is very good, Bricks lacks native elements or deep integration for many complex third-party WooCommerce add-ons, such as those for advanced memberships or bookings. This often requires developers to build custom solutions with PHP [16].

Sources: 16
Sources & Methodology
18 sources indexed

Timeframe

Last 12 months

Analysis Date

February 15, 2026

Confidence Assessment

Data confidence: HIGH (18 analytical sources, 18 total)

Methodology Note

This analysis is based on data from the official author website, technical documentation, user reviews on Capterra, community discussions on forums and Reddit, and security advisories from Patchstack.